It begs the question - whether it is necessary in the URL structure of a news website? Why these superfluous and it is not clear what the necessary investments in the URL.
That is not it better to just do a URL like: site.ru/page (without extra investments and any .html). The main advantage - get a simple short address and the ability to place the page in several categories.
Topics on this topic already, probably a billion, but as for me, most of them look like some kind of belief in the fact that the structure of the URL must repeat the structure of the site, and these beliefs are wandering from "generation to generation". Comrades, what do you say?
Extra www. and any .html certainly do not need. But the "attachments" at times required as identifiers type / content type.
Eg. if there is no identifier, then the columns and so on. have been worth their end-pages articles.
I do not know what about beliefs, but I have long been a supporter of URLs in site.com/page style, well, maybe there is still laced with some bells and whistles for the convenience of the engine (such as still include the id and so on), or share the content type (goods separately, a separate article, etc.). But in general, the shorter the better, and all that is necessary for an understanding can be included in the page itself, without any additional sections in front of him. The fatty advantages - flexibility of the structure, which further can rotate as you like at any time without affecting the URLs themselves.
But for the more seo no difference.
So this is only up to you) All these investments - so-called NC, initially every page - it's just an identifier in the database type site.ru/?page_id=12345
but only if it is convenient?
. "Superfluous www and all .html" - Well it certainly is not necessary
And what about the category name in the URL, I thought about two years ago, also wanted to reduce
And in the end I decided to try to make a new site within the url Uncategorised type site.ru/название_статьи
and you know I do not like to go back I can not, all traf and links to all site.ru/название_статьи, many problems, some related to the menus and scripts that can be used to readjust yurl under each category. And the most insulting, that I can not see the articles by category across the metric on other sites through the "login page" filtered out by yurlam categories of traffic. And could appreciate what category I carries more profits, and now all mixed up
Now I think, yes nafig me these short yurly, concentrating not on what is really important.
I agree that yurl should not be too long, but also the importance to short overvalued so bother
NC is not necessary.
The most correct answer. ))
In fact, do not care even if only in principle, NC (ie, not some vague there codes with numbers, but something sane), well, not a three-line address to receive, preferably shorter.
And the rest is necessary to determine for themselves what you need and why you need. That's me sorted by categories are not interested, but it is important to separate by type (as mentioned above, the goods separately, the article separately, category separately), so I have some metochka at the beginning of the actual slashes, which they will share. And someone is the exact opposite may be. So everything can be customized, depending on the objectives of the site.
There is no one "in the NC principle". The CNC, that without him - is practically the same. CNC for convenience only (OK, and 0.00001% as a key in an address to the SS;)). And more convenience to the administrator, not the user (which are the vast majority, and some do not see the addresses).
Although personally I am for the CNC.
Why is it not? If anything, I mean that there are no URLs in site.com?aaa=123&bbb=dsfa%098dsf&cc=24safds style or something like that. Or even site.com?page=12314. Here is the entire figoten with signs, and especially with the sign &, in some cases, may be so robust design drink blood. Not to mention the visual raspoznavalka. That even the most for yourself is much easier to see the URL site.com/mylo-duru, for example, than site.com/?kat=2321&brand=324123. Especially like the NC is possible to register almost every engine, often completely automatic transliteration of the name, it is no longer a problem. So why not make yourself more comfortable and sympathetic to those users who have to address all the same look? The principle or something, or some new sect opponents CNC suddenly formed? 😮
Who and why drink? To what number?
Dogs do not care even more users.
What is that animal? And for what?
A camping ?:
In particular, if we set the external links on this page. Do not miss all such signs.
Normal animal eyes look to. )))
For example, if I look at the statistics in gugloanalitikse, I do not smile to remember that some kind site.com/?p=3543 - this is my article about feeding cats and site.com/?p=787 - it's about Beds for dogs.
Users similar to those of your numbers is not the topic at all. And if you think that 100% of the hammer on URLs, something deeply wrong.
To post a new comment, please log in or register