It begs the question. I started googling and here's an article
/ ru / news / 2032341
Discuss? And this question - in Yandex with this all too?
What is the question then? They have long been virtually nothing on impact in terms of promotion.
And that, in fact, discuss something?
Title not affected. Deskripshen not affected. So only affects the title? In google it's like that. And Yandex?
For example it is now possible to fill only the title and all lyrics + throw. Or not?
What kind of fashion to answer a question with a question? Why these comments, if they do not make sense?
And why are you, gentlemen, you can not give a normal response to a question, but notes this way almost every topic?
On the merits. Markup in the code has not been canceled, the headlines more helpful than not.
Let's look at page tag on RBC https://www.rbc.ru/tags/?tag=Чернобыльская%20АЭС
The <H1> wrapped only "All materials with the tag" Chornobyl NPP "" with the news headlines on the tag does not wrapped in "H".
But at the same time, each article on the links c of this page has a heading "H1"
In my opinion, the answer Muller reduced to that on the tag page https://www.rbc.ru/tags/?tag=Чернобыльская%20АЭС can be any number of H1 leading to relevant articles and these articles can be combined single " H1 ".
That is, in the above tag can wrap all the headlines in H1 page they will be at least 100 - and it will not be "critical".
Well for Google Now, any information is useful, but not critical.
By title - they become "useful but not critical" about the time when those became b, and strong.
Can I allow.
Still it is possible to do the layout curve.
And speed is not required.
And white text on a black background.
The content of long articles, too, can not do.
And in general to divide them into semantic units within the divisions.
And even deskripshin can not fill, because Google itself will find a suitable piece of text.
All this for Google's helpful, but not critical.
But if it is done only for google.
And if you care about the visitors to your site, then there is a good word "usability", here on this landmark.
What exactly do you personally understand by this word?
In short - to help users conveniently.
But delve a long time, this is a separate big topic.
Examples of the most convenient information can lead sites?
Re-read the second line of my previous posts.
To post a new comment, please log in or register