If you ever get to this configuration, and you need to distinguish it from the conventional "rewrite", then maybe you will understand what I mean. ---------- Posted 16.06.2020 at 12:11 ----------
I understand it was a drain on the Ponte with a given issue . Well, OK, so we write. ---------- Posted 16.06.2020 at 12:21 ----------
What can I say ... First you precisely because the alternative world, if you saw "Or he then no longer a man for you?" Because everything exactly the opposite.
Second, you do not know our previous conversations with burunduk th and did not know exactly what it says, and I regularly parry it, these ... eeee .. :) wrong decisions.
SeVlad, in fact it was the answer to the first (rhetorical) question. The second question seemed to me poorly consistent with the first, is not fully understood, and in addition requires a sufficient volume response. Sorry, I will respond to it. And can record :)
Well, that's all, and it was found out.
And then it "atavistic revrayty," natural "CNC engines. Yeah :)
I wrote this in connection with what we are in the beginning of the topic talked, not about what you "in previous conversations with burunduk-th". Okay, let the author remains a person of interest, rather than the "unity, knows exactly what it is he needs." ---------- Posted 16.06.2020 at 13:17 ----------
I drag it? !!! Not only that, it's your idea , it is presented as "natural" in the CNC kernel engine, so more and the arrow takes.
No, well, actually from the alternate world ...
The question did not rhetorically, but entirely practical. Of our reality. However, technical, and not seoshnyh.
What you did not know .. Well, no, it does not matter. If only it could not only carried the heresy about the naturalness and atavism ...
The key word here "link". ;)
It was a response to Sitealert-a question. And I (and not only) then still doubt whether we are talking about one and the same. As it turned out, I had correctly understood the question, but he vstrevaya with this issue in our dialogue with foxi, apparently, this dialogue did not understand, because there it was not on the "rewriting" of which he then began to write (we later began to write).
I gave a "technical response" to this question in the subject line. Those. I wrote what I call "direct launch index.php" and why set it apart from the usual "rewriting". If you do not make such distinctions (or do not understand what it was about), that's your business.
When are you going to burn at the stake? :) (To repent is not going to, because there is nothing.)
Yeah. And the answer you have written an example of rewriting. And the question was - how to do it without rewriting. That is the answer turned out - no way. ChiTD. And not rattling here foxi, he wrote about something else.
A rewrite - he is rewriting, no matter how "unusual" you did not think of it.
And yes, your "direct start" are almost all CMS CNC, you are our pioneer. And this is called "rewrite."
He has mastered the technology. 😂
Sitealert, in my answer to the key points were the full path to the script file in the file system (although it is not a highlight, because, for example, in the context of the Apache virtual host and "rewrite" the mod_rewrite can be used this way, and contrary to instructions the fallback-handler mod_dir need to use a path relative to the root of the site) and, above all, "a named location The", which can be used without any other location-s, such as "location-prefix a /". This step, as the evaluation request address and converts it into an internal address which is missing here. It does not go to waste server resources.
To post a new comment, please log in or register