Circle opposition strongly narrowed. It is determined by the person calls for a boycott. Boycott - KREMLYADI cheap.

S
Site user since 30.09.2016
Offline
469
#21
veni_vidi_vivi:
so the meaning of boycott - it does not matter who came %% same ...

Only to save their own time. If you go - it is only to speak out against. And go to vote "for" - generally no sense.

Отпилю лишнее, прикручу нужное, выправлю кривое. Вытравлю вредителей.
Zikam.RU
Site user since 15.03.2006
Offline
261
#22
Sitealert:
If you go - it is only to speak out against. And go to vote "for" - generally no sense.

Yes, and "against" - meaningless.

This is some kind of know-how: the vote without legal force. Decoy for idiots and humiliation for the rest ..

полиуретановые формы для литья гипса, бетона и чего угодно (https://vk.com/zikam) декоративный камень из гибкого бетона (https://vk.com/elasticstone)
S
Site user since 30.09.2016
Offline
469
#23
Zikam.RU:
Yes, and "against" - meaningless. This is some kind of know-how: the vote without legal force.

From a legal perspective - it does not make sense. Only from a moral. Spit in the face - the moral act in this case.

<!--WEB-->
Site user since 25.01.2009
Offline
517
#24
Zikam.RU:
vote without legal force. Decoy for idiots and humiliation for all other

Idiots - those who rushes into any discussion, not acquainted with the question :

5. Changes in the Constitution of the Russian Federation, referred to in Article 1 of this Act shall be deemed approved if they are voted for more than half of Russian citizens, who took part in the all-Russian voting .If the change in the Constitution of the Russian Federation, referred to in Article 1 of this Act, voted in less than half Russian citizens, who took part in the all-Russian voting, such changes are not considered approved and article 1 of this law shall not enter into force.
Проверяю позиции сайта в сервисе Серпхант ( https://serphunt.ru ) – быстро, качественно, доступно! Почему я не всем отвечаю ( )
Lord Maverik
Site user since 15.04.2003
Offline
467
#25
Sitealert:
Spit in the face - the moral act in this case.

spit in the face itself? Well, imagine the act.

RedMall.Ru (https://redmall.ru) - Товары из Китая (Таобао, Tmall) с проверкой качества, скидка для форумчан 7% Партнерская программа 2 уровня: 5% + 5%. Подробнее. (https://redmall.ru/about/partner/)
S
Site user since 30.09.2016
Offline
469
#26
Lord Maverik:
spit in the face itself? Well, imagine the act.

Why itself? Fibber amendments actually. My name - not Putin, if that.

S
Site user since 30.09.2016
Offline
469
#27
Lord Maverik:
spit in the face itself? Well, imagine the act.

Why itself? Fibber amendments actually. My name - not Putin, if that.

Zikam.RU
Site user since 15.03.2006
Offline
261
#28
<-! WEB ->:
Idiots - those who rushes into any discussion, not acquainted with the question :

Traditionally, an idiot is any who dare to play with the crooks in thimbles.

But traditionally - no idiot does not realize it .. 🚬

<!--WEB-->
Site user since 25.01.2009
Offline
517
#29
Zikam.RU:
idiot is any who dare to play with cheats thimbles

<-! WEB ->:
These howls "still regarded as they need" - just a way to give up without a fight and try to save face at the same time. Unfortunately, the visuals do not understand. As a result, a person they still lose, and the chance for a civilized struggle is not used.

So what about the legal force? I found? 🍿

Lord Maverik
Site user since 15.04.2003
Offline
467
#30
<-! WEB ->:
So what about the legal force? I found?

Of course. Legally the amendments adopted and apply.

Everything else - just a circus and a farce.

---------- Posted 11.06.2020 at 12:19 ----------

Here's an example from an article in Medusa:

But the vote is offered when your word will say is all bodies in whose jurisdiction the amendments approved. If the people vote for, it will not be a problem. And if the mind? After all, we at least theoretically, we should assume such a possibility. The law says that in this case, the amendments will not take effect. But article 136 of the Constitution does not imply the possibility of non-entry into force of the amendments approved by the State Duma, the Federation Council and two-thirds of regional parliaments.



---------- Posted 11.06.2020 at 12:21 ----------

and another additive

The all-Russian referendum vote instead of Article 3 of the Constitution says that the highest direct expression of the power of the people is the referendum and free elections. And what is "all-Russian voting"? Nowhere does it say that it is an expression of the people's power. In fact, a nationwide vote on the amendments to the Constitution is subject to referendum signs, which are contained in the Russian legislation. That it is, in fact, it is a referendum. But lawmakers did not call it a referendum for good reason: the proposed rules of the meeting strongly disagree with the rules of the Federal Constitutional Law "On Referendum of the Russian Federation." And therefore came up with a new entity, the Constitution is not provided.



---------- Posted 11.06.2020 at 12:22 ----------

By the way at the time of writing this article in Medusa, voting COP more debts.

Even today, it has already passed and the COP adopted amendments.

Voting for unrelated amendments Another problem - whether the proposed procedure is not the letter of the Constitution and democratic principles. Corrections are set not interconnected norms (or standards of blocks). The president himself, in his message to the Federal Assembly divided the proposed amendments then seven blocks. But later added another amendment, not associated with these blocks. Thus, the president clearly violated the provisions of the Federal Law "On the order of adoption and entry into force of amendments to the Russian Constitution", which requires that a single law for the amendment of the Constitution covered interconnected change of the constitutional text (as, incidentally, was in 2008, when the two are not connected with each other block corrections have been made by two different bills). Because of this, citizens are invited to vote either for or against the whole package of amendments. And those who support one amendment but does not accept the other, will be deprived of the opportunity to express their will.

https://meduza.io/feature/2020/03/11/popravki-v-konstitutsiyu-prinimayut-po-ochen-protsedure-kotoraya-ranshe-nigde-i-nikogda-ne-ispolzovalas-ona-voobsche-zakonna

---------- Posted 11.06.2020 at 12:24 ----------

But though for whom I write it all. So simple.

To post a new comment, please log in or register