In fact, there is some conflict.
1. progolosuesh against the amendments - so you are satisfied with the constitution in the form as it is. I was not happy with it, it is necessary to take a new one.
2. progolosuesh for amendments - to make a completely senseless act, because it is a pile of waste paper, rather than a meaningful document.
In the end, he bowed to the fact that all the same will vote against it, to express their attitude to this delirium.
Sitealert, actually vote has no legal force. You just need to show that they would come.
+ Sawed yards allocated to it
+ Then another talk at all angles that the type of people that come ...
Well Yurik above cited law, which spelled out that the amendments will not be accepted with a negative vote.
But at first I did not want to take part in the vote because of this conflict - vote for or vote against all the same zugzwang, so it's best not to vote. Otherwise, "for" amendments - is for this nonsense, "against" amendments - is for the existing constitution. And I am neither one nor the other are not satisfied, do not want to make my voice was interpreted in one way or another.
But in the end I decided nevertheless to vote against, as a demonstration of my relationship to the antics of the clowns.
Well here it is, in any case, reasonable and understandable position, articulate. But "I'm not going to vote, because I have the honor and dignity" - this is nonsense bredyachy.
Sobyanin write 10 yards to the call for a vote has started ... Field of Dreams, your left.
And in other parts of the prizes are going to play? :)
in regions other methods. Moscow already on that just do not try to drive the vote
We also have some kind of prize-draws promised, I did not penetrate.
and that it will give? Now we come to 96%? and? that this show? for what ?
Come and vote against - show your attitude ... to sit at home - tacitly supported or cowardly hiding - choose on taste ...
To post a new comment, please log in or register