Whether it is necessary to reject links from authoritative sites, and leave only one with such resources as:
That is the idea of this, so that only one link to your site with such resources, the rest reject Google Disavow Links Tool tool.
Then one link will carry more weight on the landing page of this portal (through links to eliminate, or leading to multiple pages with a single donor).
Is there any sense in this idea?
What a crazy idea, IMHO.
No offense. )))
And internal links are not there? ))
You do not need to do it. esteem for what service created
Yes, all imasiter once said that a complete nonsense. Just TC thinks that one link from one site will have more "weight" to bear, than a lot. Quite the contrary, the more links the better efficiency give !!! And that's not the idea, and tested for years
You really have nothing to do. Nothing is rejected. It is better to pay this time, the development of the site.
Not necessarily on the development of just such a topic about the links that you need still mined (obtaining) helpful links to these sites
And further advice, you do not just link to the site, and someone interested in the information that is on the website, so they refer. And I think a lot of pages on the site interesting, which is why very strong anchor links are still working
Each subsequent link with one and the same donor, gives less weight .. (other things being equal, of course the same - even 10ya link with the muzzle, will provide more than the previous 10 from the basement 3ur investment.) But give :) So, you have in mind some kind of sabotage :) Do you want to clean the reference profile - primarily filter the grid on one ah-pee (Google is not very fond of them), add the donor dizalov where exchanges Nemer, and / or there is an obvious link Zaspa garbage. Average chektrasta for this is enough (most importantly, it does not look at the conclusions, just do soritrovku results ah-pee, count outgoing and Exchange Commission ..)
To post a new comment, please log in or register