ExpressAutoComUa

Sower:
А где источник этого ответа сотрудника гугла?

Sesol:
P.S. Тех клиентов, которые совсем не в теме и кого можно "развести" лапшой на уши в расчет не берем, берем именно тех, кто понимает и следит за развитием ситуации.

Whilst this update is affecting 11.8% of all queries it’s not actually affecting very many sites. The algorithm is being applied at a domain level rather than a specific page level and the sites affected are so large that even a few hundred sites suffering could cause 11.8% of all queries to be altered.

Testing Google's Panda algorithm: CNET analysis

Google lists the following as “questions that one could use to assess the ‘quality’ of a page or an article”:
* Would you trust the information presented in this article?
* Is this article written by an expert or enthusiast who knows the topic well, or is it more shallow in nature?
* Does the site have duplicate, overlapping, or redundant articles on the same or similar topics with slightly different keyword variations?
* Would you be comfortable giving your credit card information to this site?
* Does this article have spelling, stylistic, or factual errors?
* Are the topics driven by genuine interests of readers of the site, or does the site generate content by attempting to guess what might rank well in search engines?
* Does the article provide original content or information, original reporting, original research, or original analysis?
* Does the page provide substantial value when compared to other pages in search results?
* How much quality control is done on content?
* Does the article describe both sides of a story?
* Is the site a recognized authority on its topic?
* Is the content mass-produced by or outsourced to a large number of creators, or spread across a large network of sites, so that individual pages or sites don’t get as much attention or care?
* Was the article edited well, or does it appear sloppy or hastily produced?
* For a health related query, would you trust information from this site?
* Would you recognize this site as an authoritative source when mentioned by name?
* Does this article provide a complete or comprehensive description of the topic?
* Does this article contain insightful analysis or interesting information that is beyond obvious?
* Is this the sort of page you’d want to bookmark, share with a friend, or recommend?
* Does this article have an excessive amount of ads that distract from or interfere with the main content?
* Would you expect to see this article in a printed magazine, encyclopedia or book?
* Are the articles short, unsubstantial, or otherwise lacking in helpful specifics?
* Are the pages produced with great care and attention to detail vs. less attention to detail?
* Would users complain when they see pages from this site?

Tesmos:
Где про сам алгоритм можно наглядно почитать?

cined:
Добрый день! Вот такая проблема: переспамил главные страницы у двух сайтов (несколько одинаковых фраз в стронгах, ключевиков много). Сейчас релевантными показываются внутренние страницы и места соответственно занимают за пределами 50. Был ли у кого опыт такой, достаточно ли будет разбавить текст главных, убрать спамные стронги для возврата на прежние позиции?

Tesmos:
интересно узнать практические примеры по этому поводу

gasyoun:
Может ли повлиять на трастранк?" Влияет ли на что-нибудь урл, написанный простым текстом? Распознается ли он как урл, или трактуется как просто слово в предложении. Или же "нет ссылки, не о чем говорить"?

Dara_White:
нужно просто с представителем SEO-команды найти общий язык и убедить его, что надо что-то менять. Например, разбить эти ключи на группы для нескольких страниц.