Флорида-фильтр

кстати интересная ситуация с яхой

Все равно алгоритм не разгадаем, да и через некоторое время опять что-нибудь поменяют. Поэтому лучше не мучаться зря, а просто делать сайты и ссылками меняться

- showing up for one big phrase is probably not the best philosophy. Target a bunch of different phrases. Instead of worrying about rankings, spend a whole day looking at your server logs and the phrases that people have used to reach your site this year. Being #1 for a high-profile keyphrase is nice, but much better to show up for a broad base of queries.
- SEO = change. At least at Google, you can assume that there is a constant (or even accelerating) amount of work being done to improve quality and our other services. Sometimes that's visible to the outside world. But even when it looks like nothing major is happening at Google, lots of work is going on. Sometimes we're building infrastructure for the next generation of quality improvements. If you think there's a magic formula to SEO, you're going to be disappointed. The only magic formula that I know of is to build a diversified, content-rich site that users love and link to on their own--the sort of site that you can promote with newsletters, or forums, or any of a hundred different ways such that search engine traffic is nice but not essential. It's harder to do that than to fiddle with PR bars/buy links/sign guestbooks/blogs/whatever

Как писал Nikolai Popkov
CKA3KA,

нет, ситуация обычная

http://search.yahoo.com/search?ei=UTF-8&fr=sfp&p=drug+detox

Как писал Nikolai Popkov
GoogleGuy,
Цитата:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- showing up for one big phrase is probably not the best philosophy. Target a bunch of different phrases. Instead of worrying about rankings, spend a whole day looking at your server logs and the phrases that people have used to reach your site this year. Being #1 for a high-profile keyphrase is nice, but much better to show up for a broad base of queries.
- SEO = change. At least at Google, you can assume that there is a constant (or even accelerating) amount of work being done to improve quality and our other services. Sometimes that's visible to the outside world. But even when it looks like nothing major is happening at Google, lots of work is going on. Sometimes we're building infrastructure for the next generation of quality improvements. If you think there's a magic formula to SEO, you're going to be disappointed. The only magic formula that I know of is to build a diversified, content-rich site that users love and link to on their own--the sort of site that you can promote with newsletters, or forums, or any of a hundred different ways such that search engine traffic is nice but not essential. It's harder to do that than to fiddle with PR bars/buy links/sign guestbooks/blogs/whatever

не повесили пожизненных банов на наши сайты

именно по тем серпам на которые есть спрос в адвордс.

Fact: Google has a dictionary that it uses for word stemming.
Fact: Google Adwords has a dictionary/database it is using for Expanded Broad Matching. This database includes both word stemming variations and different related keywords.

Theory: Google is using the same database as Adwords for word stemming.

Tenuous Theory: Google is doing some Expanded Broad Matching in the normal SERPS using the Adwords database. Obviously this will only affect keywords or phrases which have expanded broad matches in the database.

Conspiracy Theory: Google is using a different algorithm with keyword combinations with high bids in the Adwords database. A threshold of about $1 for top position fits with the results I have seen, but I don't want to believe the evidence!
.

писать по-русски